Practicelink Family Medicine Family Med - Tx #601331

(Natural News) A shocking new written report published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when significant women are given covid vaccinations during their get-go or second trimesters, they endure an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.

This stunning finding, explained beneath, is self-evident from the data published in a new study entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-nineteen Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons." Just as disturbing as the data is the fact that the study authors evidently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth near vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.

Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News commodity, we checked with our own science contacts to review the data and double check all the math. In doing and then, we were able to confirm two things:

1. Yep, the study shows an 82% charge per unit of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or 2nd trimesters.
2. Yes, the written report authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained beneath) or they are incompetent and fabricated a glaring mistake that brings into question their credibility.

In other words, this study was almost certainly a camouflage to try to claim vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly safe. Merely the written report information actually prove quite the oppose.

Here's how:

700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester

Table 4 from the report, shown below, reveals that a total of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or 2nd trimesters. (Yous have to read the fine print below the table to come across this disclosure.)

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their outset or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies striking the 20-week mark. These are indicated equally "spontaneous abortions" in the table.

In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their outset or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.

It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known every bit "stillbirths" and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could non have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, by definition.

Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the incorrect denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" adding, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their outset or second trimesters.

Put another fashion, it is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the offset time during her tertiary trimester to have a "spontaneous abortion" in the first xx weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the commencement 20 weeks (and pregnant women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't be included in the denominator used to summate the spontaneous abortion charge per unit.

The authors of this study should receive an honor in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they obviously tried to pull a sleight-of-hand trick to make information technology appear that vaccines are prophylactic for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than than 4 out of 5 unborn babies in the first 20 weeks of gestation, at to the lowest degree in this data set. (It'due south a pocket-sized set of 127 pregnant women, so we'd like to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more clear picture.)

Apples and oranges, lemons and limes

A unproblematic way to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of l lemons and 50 limes, with a science report asking the question, "What percentage of lemons are yellowish?" The scientists count all the xanthous fruit and accomplish the number fifty. They mistakenly divide 50 into 100 because in that location are 100 total piece of fruit, then they declare, "50% of lemons are yellow" because information technology's 50/100.

But the other fifty pieces of fruit tin't perhaps be included considering they're limes, non lemons. And so the correct math is 50/50, which ways 100% of the lemons are yellow. That's the right reply.

In this science paper, they are using 827 equally the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the third trimester, which is long past the time window during which a "spontaneous abortion" can occur. And since significant women aren't time travelers, they can't get back in time and written report a spontaneous abortion from months before.

If vaccine scientists either tin can't do this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the world with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — and then "science" has already failed its core promise: to offer "bear witness-based" conclusions to understand the world effectually us.

Withal when four out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the first 20 weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion charge per unit is only 12.6%. Why? Because they're covering upwards the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, nearly likely.

In fact, the key author of the written report, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is likewise named in numerous other studies that claim to certificate adverse reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. Information technology raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the same error in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no meaning take chances of agin events? For example, here's some other study he co-authored: "Adverse events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013."

That study concluded, "Review of VAERS reports did not place any new or unexpected safety concerns subsequently TIV-ID."

But is that conclusion based on bad math, like the report on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? We telephone call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Maybe this aforementioned written report builder has made the same systematic error (or perchance a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn't exist the first fourth dimension one author was establish to have made systematic mistakes beyond dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.

And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. Nosotros tin't just accept bad math and call information technology "science" when the bad math doesn't check out.

Fasten protein injections into pregnant women an "barbarism," warns Dr. Peter McCullough

In the mean time, it'due south clear that 4 out of five pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the offset 20 weeks (at least, according to the small data set nosotros have and then far). And that means the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.

Recollect: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) bear witness that covid vaccine spike proteins direct assault reproductive organs such as the ovaries. Given that fasten proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with homo cells, it should be no surprise any that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.

I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of ii medical journals. Although he does non characterize this every bit a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more than than lxxx% of unborn babies to exist aborted. He calls it an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on meaning women is "shameful." You lot tin hear him in his own words in the following interview:

Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97

All this ways that live births may plummet past iii.2 1000000 over the next year, in the United states of america solitary, if every pregnant woman is vaccinated during the first xx weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is beingness called a medical "atrocity."

The fields of medicine and science accept turned against humanity. They are now killing babies past the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, heart attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.

The vaccine industry is at state of war with the homo race. And live-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden's state management arbiter once characterized human children equally an "environmental hazard."

This is a war. A bioweapons attack. And it goes beyond mere "crimes against humanity." It is a spiritual betrayal of the entire human race past the institutions of science and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated by a desire to assistance humanity, but are now conspicuously shown to exist working towards humanity'south destruction.

Learn more in today's listen-opening Situation Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1

Hear a new podcast each weekday at:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

littlefieldmonce1990.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html

Share this post